[thxbb12]

Maybe you could use your own advice before complaining I don't read what you wrote.
Did you actually read what I wrote a few posts back?
Here it goes:

"Sometimes you may have a large difference in brightness between say the foreground and the sky.
A solution is to use a tripod and shoot multiple shots at different exposures and merge them.
Another solution is to use a graduated filter, but it only works if you the 2 areas are perfectly separated (well close to), e.g. with a line.
A last solution is to take a single shot and post-process. Not perfect, but you can get descent results if the sensor doesn't introduce too much noise after post-processing (typically pulling dark areas)."

So yes, having better DR at base ISO is useful. And the RP sucks in this regard. I was giving the comparison with MFT because it shows well that Canon tech is behind given it doesn't do better than the best of MFT sensors (which is 4x smaller).

I did read that and I did respond to a post of you here when I misread your post. I did start to write a "Sorry, I misread your post" a few days ago, but decided it was not worthwhile/helpful.

I explained in my post above that I disagree with that you get worthwhile images with that shadow pulling nonsense. If you want good landscape images, take images when the light is attractive and you actually will get nice results. Just a tip. 

But if shadow pulling fake looking images is your thing, by all means, swallow the high DR is a must pill. 

I love this one: "take images when the light is attractive": I'm glad you told me this tip BC, because this never occured to me before ?
AHAHHAHAHA!
Here is a tip for you: anyone with a wife and kids will tell you this is pure fantasy

A few samples to illustrate why the more DR, the merrier (for each pair of image, the first is the unedited one):