01-08-2011, 02:32 PM
I eventually went with the Sigma 150mm myself, and am generally happy with it. As mentioned before, with the Sigma 2x on it, it does NOT AF. I do debate from time to time if I should have got the 180mm for the longer working distance which from memory seems quite a bit more for the small difference in focal length.
Any reason the Sigma 180mm macro isn't also considered?
I do like the finish of the Sigma <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
Any reason the Sigma 180mm macro isn't also considered?
I do like the finish of the Sigma <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.