08-01-2020, 05:48 PM
(This post was last modified: 08-01-2020, 06:30 PM by Brightcolours.)
To update on this old thread:
I wrote about how DXO totally messed up the data, coming up with nonsense conclusions about the Canon 1D X mark III sensor.
I just now discovered for myself that DXO has since changed the review. Not sure when they did that, because the posting date reads "June 19, 2020", but that was the date of the original, totally nonsensical review.
https://www.dxomark.com/canon-eos-1d-x-mark-iii-sensor-review/
Now it is more in line with photonstophotos measurements.
Seems like a pattern with DXO, posting wrong results with a lot of fanfare of Canon stuff, and then either not correct, or correct later in silence, when the damage has been done. Oh well.
I wrote about how DXO totally messed up the data, coming up with nonsense conclusions about the Canon 1D X mark III sensor.
I just now discovered for myself that DXO has since changed the review. Not sure when they did that, because the posting date reads "June 19, 2020", but that was the date of the original, totally nonsensical review.
https://www.dxomark.com/canon-eos-1d-x-mark-iii-sensor-review/
Now it is more in line with photonstophotos measurements.
Seems like a pattern with DXO, posting wrong results with a lot of fanfare of Canon stuff, and then either not correct, or correct later in silence, when the damage has been done. Oh well.