08-10-2020, 08:30 AM
(This post was last modified: 08-10-2020, 08:40 AM by Brightcolours.)
Ok, now it gets a bit out there, sort of. Shooting multi camera productions with not at all good form factor for video mirrorless stills cameras.
So no matter what anyone finds out about the R5, it is a lousy camera? Ok, got you.
Facts still remain.... It does 4K30 and 4K60 in higher quality, with better C-log, higher bitrate, oversampling from 8K, with much better AF for video if desired, much better IBIS for video, much less jello effect, but the A7 III is better, not just in some cases, but all cases. Right?
Even in multi camera serious setups, where you record externally for long durations in 4K60, where the R5 apparently does not overheat. Got it, the A7 III is the best.
So no matter what anyone finds out about the R5, it is a lousy camera? Ok, got you.
Facts still remain.... It does 4K30 and 4K60 in higher quality, with better C-log, higher bitrate, oversampling from 8K, with much better AF for video if desired, much better IBIS for video, much less jello effect, but the A7 III is better, not just in some cases, but all cases. Right?
Even in multi camera serious setups, where you record externally for long durations in 4K60, where the R5 apparently does not overheat. Got it, the A7 III is the best.