Given Canon's capabilities, EOS M could be a great system. However, they made the rather stupid decision to release it with a small mount - despite being late in the market - probably due to their usual arrogance (at the time) that DSLRs are here to stay and a superior choice for "serious" photographers. So now they are in the bad position of having to support 3 different mount systems in a dying market - with no upgrade path for M-mount users.
It's probably because the below is more import to me than the number of megapixels beyond a certain threshold:
![[Image: dr.png]](https://www.opticallimits.com/images/dr.png)
(08-21-2020, 07:28 AM)Brightcolours Wrote: But seriously, when you look at photonstophotos, you (should) realize that when printing at the same size, the noise is similar, and only in high ISO scenarios noise would be apparent. So what does the higher res. bring you? Higher res. when you want to print bigger. So, similar at high iSO and same size printing, advantage when printing bigger especially with lower ISO.
Weird how every step up in resolution since 6mp (or probably before that too) triggers the same response from you... :-P
No idea why I would need a "native" tele lens on EOS M when with the simple adapter things work just fine. Must be my sensible nature.
It's probably because the below is more import to me than the number of megapixels beyond a certain threshold:
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji