• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Forums > Back > Confused by lens review vs. lens manufacturer data
#5
[quote name='turboman' timestamp='1294751912' post='5418']

I understand this. That is why I cannot explain the obervations I made, repeated here again:

- Zeiss data (only lens) show same resolution in corner for 4/3 sensor size.

- Photozone (lens Zeiss + NEX-5 sensor)show much lower corner resolution.

Simplistic conclusion would be that NEX-5 sensor has low corner resolution.

[/quote]

Sensor design is uniform across its area except in the case of the M8, M9 and the recent Fuji X100 sensor where they have the off-set micro-lenses. So other sensors can't possibly have absolute resolution figures that differ in the corners from the center.



Like Klaus said, PZ numbers are from a camera system and not just the lens alone. Leaving experiment errors aside, it's possible that one lens suits a sensor better than another. For example, one lens might be more tele-centric than the other.



However, how the PZ "border" and "extreme border" values are fairly meaningless in practice as I have explained below:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/genotypewriter/5207301499/



GTW
  Reply


Messages In This Thread
Confused by lens review vs. lens manufacturer data - by turboman - 01-10-2011, 03:29 AM
Confused by lens review vs. lens manufacturer data - by turboman - 01-11-2011, 01:18 PM
Confused by lens review vs. lens manufacturer data - by genotypewriter - 01-13-2011, 08:35 PM
Confused by lens review vs. lens manufacturer data - by genotypewriter - 01-15-2011, 07:53 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)