The sample gallery looks quite good ....
Kind regards, Wim
If so, according to the tests I have seen, ity actually is slightly better than the RF 24-105 IS STM.
Kind regards, Wim
Kind regards, Wim
(02-08-2021, 07:45 AM)Rover Wrote: You ain't seen nuthin' yet... The 24-200 is reported to be that and much more.You mean the 24-240 I assume?
But then again, auto correction should mask most of that.
If so, according to the tests I have seen, ity actually is slightly better than the RF 24-105 IS STM.
Kind regards, Wim
Gear: Canon EOS R with 3 primes and 2 zooms, 4 EF-R adapters, Canon EOS 5 (analog), 9 Canon EF primes, a lone Canon EF zoom, 2 extenders, 2 converters, tubes; Olympus OM-D 1 Mk II & Pen F with 12 primes, 6 zooms, and 3 Metabones EF-MFT adapters ....