[Kunzite]

Falsehood. Gets another one? They're using the metering sensor.

Using the metering sensor for something it isn't designed for (and for which way better alternatives exist) is a workaround. Not a falsehood.

That's a red herring, the claim Klaus made is that it "gets another one". That - not your red herring - is a falsehood.
And care to explain why the 307,000 RGBIr pixels sensor is not designed for subject recognition?

---

i

Fact #3: Eye detection in DSLRs doesn't make any sense - albeit it's surely possible. It does require the main sensor plus a secondary, relatively high-resolution sensor for AI analytics. So a camera design that already requires a couple of strange workarounds (mirror, prism, AF sensor, exposure meter) gets another one.

Falsehood. Gets another one? They're using the metering sensor.

This doesn't negate the fact that the extra real estate for the exposure meter isn't needed for the exposure function ;-)

First, your "gets another one" claim was false. Now you're making another claim about "extra real estate". Are you sure the new sensor is larger than it would have been just for metering? We're not talking about center weighted, by the way.

It's weird. I'm discussing with knowledgeable people - you should know these things better than me - but it doesn't feels that way.