06-29-2021, 11:17 AM
Yes, $1700 vs $2300 for the RF 15-35mm f/2.8 seems a bit strange.
If you can afford the 14-35mm you could as well go for the faster lens. A single extra mm can't really cut it.
The Sony 12-24/4G costs $1800 - so maybe they took this as guidance. The Canon is 2mm longer but with IS so $100 less isn't unreasonable.
Conversely ... the Sigma 14-28mm f/2.8 costs $1300 - as always a bargain.
If you can afford the 14-35mm you could as well go for the faster lens. A single extra mm can't really cut it.
The Sony 12-24/4G costs $1800 - so maybe they took this as guidance. The Canon is 2mm longer but with IS so $100 less isn't unreasonable.
Conversely ... the Sigma 14-28mm f/2.8 costs $1300 - as always a bargain.
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji