[Brightcolours]

"mass market brainwashed by reviews and which forgot photography." <-- wow, that's really out there.

It's true though

---

The product page was not up when I wrote that, and now it is we can see it renders nicely, like the Sony does.

The product page was up when you wrote that; you're lying once again. Twice, because IMHO the D FA's rendering is not merely "like the Sony". Not because the Sony is bad, but because the Pentax was intended to soften the bokeh.

The rest of your post is just trolling. There's the typical pattern: first someone says "Sony/Nikon/whatever is oh so much better than Pentax!", I offer counterarguments, and then the shouts begins: "you're attacking Sony/Nikon/whatever!!!111oneoneone". That's ridiculous.

Limited is just a product line name. It means what Pentax decides it means; and the D FA Limited is truer to its name than the DAs.
What some random dude on the Internet thinks it should mean is irrelevant.
Otherwise, Canon L series can only designate Large lenses (but not the eXtra Large ones, and definitely not the Small ones).

The product page was not up, at least not where I looked. Silly man. 
Pentax' blurb blahblahs about the bokeh, but the Sony softens the bokeh pretty well. Just because you drank the Pentax coolaid does not mean the Sony renders worse... But to you it does mean that, because Pentax.

Funny thing: noone said "Sony/Nikon/Whatever is oh so much better than Pentax". In fact, Klaus just said "If true that's 50% more than Sony/Nikon are asking for their 20mm f/1.8 - thus even faster/wider lenses."

So, in your terms, "you are lying again, Kuznite". You then just started to "bash" the excellent Sony, all on your own. No one is "bashing" the Pentax (only criticising the price, and making fun of the nonsensical "Limited" moniker)...

Silly stuff