(10-21-2021, 09:03 PM)Rover Wrote:(10-21-2021, 07:24 PM)Brightcolours Wrote:(10-21-2021, 04:17 PM)Rover Wrote: So I wonder what the catch is. Field curvature?
That it does not fit on your camera :O
I don't think it would have been on my radar even if it had fit. I don't need just every lens on the planet, you know, even though at 8 lenses in stock, I might look like a hoarder.
8 lenses? OI would not call you a hoarder at all. IMO, you are only a hoarder if you keep lenses you do not and/or cannot use any longer.
Of course with that definition I am not a hoarder either, with a total of 39 lenses including converters, extenders and speed boosters ...
(10-22-2021, 11:53 AM)MatjazO Wrote: Good to see that a small super WA like this one can be pretty good. Not my cup of tea as it is way too wide for casual walk around. I would take zoom over it as being so wide it is difficult to sort out the framimg just by making a step froward or backward.I wish a lens like this would have been available 40 years ago. I got a 20 mm lens back then, and a 15 mm was possible too, but the latter was 3x the price. and very big and heavy. The 20 mm was a month salary back then ....
Yet, always nice to have an option.
It was a great lens at a time, but a wider lens would have been extemely useful to me for my purposes at the time. Of course now I own a 10 mm rectilinear lens, and a 17 mm TS lens, so I am not really complaining.
However, I may get one. Size and price seem rather convenient, and the sample photographs I have seen really look good ....
Kind regards, Wim
Gear: Canon EOS R with 3 primes and 2 zooms, 4 EF-R adapters, Canon EOS 5 (analog), 9 Canon EF primes, a lone Canon EF zoom, 2 extenders, 2 converters, tubes; Olympus OM-D 1 Mk II & Pen F with 12 primes, 6 zooms, and 3 Metabones EF-MFT adapters ....