10-29-2021, 03:37 PM
(10-29-2021, 11:09 AM)Brightcolours Wrote: Nit just dpr says "60 Hz"... I don't think that a bit higher resolution view finder with a higher refresh rate makes for a better sports camera... Of course, higher than 60 Hz is easier on the eyes. But, with LCDs a lower refresh rate is not that bad as it used to be with CRT screens (yeah i am that old).
But bit more important is the AF, the subject tracking. Which Nikon appears to have nailed with the Z9.
Maybe the Z9 has a 120 Hz refresh rate for its EVF, and a 60hz refresh rate for the live view using the EVF. That means easy on the eyes anyway?
The Canon EVFs have a high res., but don't use it all the time. The Nikon EVF is the brightest, according to Nikon. It probably will be a very nice sports and high res. camera.
Without going down the causes and effects of RR ....... I would like to know for one which refresh rate it has ? .......... DPR state 60 Hz ....... Jarod Polin says 120 Hz and as he was always critical of the Z6/7 refresh rate, I'm leaning towards 120Hz ........ I must admit it performed like the latter. Matt Granger stated 120 Hz eh!
Btw the R5 performs great with it's 120 Hz RR doing BIF..... I still believe it's because of that ...
Other than that doubt the Z9 performed well .........