02-07-2011, 09:46 PM
[quote name='you2' timestamp='1297114540' post='5938']
Pout; had no clue it would be that expensive. Seems a bit excessive given the 100-400 is only 1/4 the cost. Oh well.
[/quote]
Don't forget the effect the aperture plays. The front element(s) will be similar in size to the 300mm f/2.8 which will dominate the glass cost.
Pout; had no clue it would be that expensive. Seems a bit excessive given the 100-400 is only 1/4 the cost. Oh well.
[/quote]
Don't forget the effect the aperture plays. The front element(s) will be similar in size to the 300mm f/2.8 which will dominate the glass cost.
<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.