06-19-2023, 01:18 AM
I mostly agree with your statement.
Yet, there is a common perception that MFT "should" be more affordable because you are getting "less".
However, at least, the OM-5 isn't new tech. This is basically an E-M1 II in the shape of an E-M5 III, plus a few software tweaks.
I reckon the related production machinery has long been written off. So the OM-5 "should" be more affordable really.
Yet, there is a common perception that MFT "should" be more affordable because you are getting "less".
However, at least, the OM-5 isn't new tech. This is basically an E-M1 II in the shape of an E-M5 III, plus a few software tweaks.
I reckon the related production machinery has long been written off. So the OM-5 "should" be more affordable really.
Chief Editor - opticallimits.com
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji
Doing all things Canon, MFT, Sony and Fuji