08-21-2023, 01:19 PM
(08-20-2023, 04:51 PM)toni-a Wrote: If it's just an extension tube, I won't pay double the price just to have the name "Canon" on it.Well, up to you really.
Extension tubes are quite easy to make and remember this adapter will always be on the same lens which is rather old and doesn't have important Metadata to share
Having said that, from the technical research I have read the Canon adapters have better alignment than any of the competitors.
While that may be less of a problem with real extension tubes, for macro, as you only use the central part of the image, it may well be with adapters to use a lens on a different camera.
I have been using Canon RF-adapters (all 3 types) for years now, since I got the EOS-R, and I am very happy with it. I won't take a risk with anything else considering my experiences with other, non-OEM lensless adapters.
Gear: Canon EOS R with 3 primes and 2 zooms, 4 EF-R adapters, Canon EOS 5 (analog), 9 Canon EF primes, a lone Canon EF zoom, 2 extenders, 2 converters, tubes; Olympus OM-D 1 Mk II & Pen F with 12 primes, 6 zooms, and 3 Metabones EF-MFT adapters ....
