09-09-2023, 10:02 AM
(08-24-2023, 07:11 AM)Klaus Wrote: https://www.tamron.com/global/consumer/n...30824.html
Looks quite "long" (as usual) despite them stating that it's compact.
I suppose this will kill their own 20-40mm f/2.8
Very long (114 vs 87 mm, almost exactly as the 28-75!) 100g heavier and f/4.0.
Not enough for real estate, museums, churches and other historical interiors as well as city nights.
I passed on the Sony 20-70/4.0 and will for this 17-50/4,0 but keep my 20-40/2,8.