01-04-2024, 05:20 AM
It sounds like a Noble cause. An encrypted watermark that tracks edits. But to what degree of usefulness? Can you un-edit it to the original or prove it is the original? Is it going to have a two-step verification so only you can edit it?
I see so many holes I'm not even sure how or where to begin listing them. Already a lot of the editing we do will is done with AI. The Google Pixel camera does some cool stuff with AI that alters the original a lot. Ergo, at what editing point is the image going to be considered AI generated? Many AI images start with a real photo(s). Moreover, if it becomes a standard that camera makers and photo editing software use, then why wouldn't someone be able to hack it? Using AI nonetheless!
I see so many holes I'm not even sure how or where to begin listing them. Already a lot of the editing we do will is done with AI. The Google Pixel camera does some cool stuff with AI that alters the original a lot. Ergo, at what editing point is the image going to be considered AI generated? Many AI images start with a real photo(s). Moreover, if it becomes a standard that camera makers and photo editing software use, then why wouldn't someone be able to hack it? Using AI nonetheless!