Toni, your example simply shows that a 85mm f1.8 fullframe lens mounted on an APS-C camera acts exactly as a 130mm f2.8 lens would on fullframe...
It's a consequence of the crop factor.
Talking about macro, if you really want to carry the lightest/smaller gear, then you should strongly consider an MFT system such as an Olympus/OM body with the 60mm f2.8 macro. This lens is super tiny.
Such a system would be equivalent to:
- 120mm f5.6 on fullframe
- 80mm f3.7 on APS-C
Even greater gains ;-) (at the cost of equivalent aperture obviously).
It's a consequence of the crop factor.
Talking about macro, if you really want to carry the lightest/smaller gear, then you should strongly consider an MFT system such as an Olympus/OM body with the 60mm f2.8 macro. This lens is super tiny.
Such a system would be equivalent to:
- 120mm f5.6 on fullframe
- 80mm f3.7 on APS-C
Even greater gains ;-) (at the cost of equivalent aperture obviously).