02-11-2011, 08:43 PM
Hey guys,
in your most updated review of the Tamron 60mm, you wrote that the underexposure problem had been corrected but "There is one exception, though: wide open the lens produces visibly darker images than at any other aperture setting."
What does this mean exactly? Are you saying that the 60mm at F2 is visibly darker than any other lens at F2? or are you saying that the 60mm at F2 is visibly darker than the 60mm at F22?
Also, when you say visibly darker - how much is it underexposing by? a stop? two stops?
Do you know why this is happening? Or do you have a reasonable guess as to what's going on?
Thanks for any help! (I'm sure you're sick to death of hearing about this unusual lens)
-curriguy
in your most updated review of the Tamron 60mm, you wrote that the underexposure problem had been corrected but "There is one exception, though: wide open the lens produces visibly darker images than at any other aperture setting."
What does this mean exactly? Are you saying that the 60mm at F2 is visibly darker than any other lens at F2? or are you saying that the 60mm at F2 is visibly darker than the 60mm at F22?
Also, when you say visibly darker - how much is it underexposing by? a stop? two stops?
Do you know why this is happening? Or do you have a reasonable guess as to what's going on?
Thanks for any help! (I'm sure you're sick to death of hearing about this unusual lens)
-curriguy