12-06-2024, 09:13 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-06-2024, 02:50 PM by MLonlooker.)
SD wrote:
BTW, there are "such" blatant inconsistencies in tests between FF and APS-C sensors that I believe that every time you unmount and remount an internal lens you there are variations due to mechanical tolerances.
.................................................
The results seem to be in line with many non module pancakes that CF has tested (FF/APSc) to date and looking at the tiny modules, expecting sharp corners especially at the price is a big ask.
We see his test results but CF takes plenty of images to see what the results are in real world situations as he is quite a fan of pancakes.
................................
Klaus wrote;
I wonder whether C.Frost refocuses in the corners. If not, the test results won't often reflect real life.
Field curvature hits hard in chart-based tests because the DoF is comparatively shallow.
I posted this question in the comments section of the video ..... maybe he will come back with a reply .........
BTW, there are "such" blatant inconsistencies in tests between FF and APS-C sensors that I believe that every time you unmount and remount an internal lens you there are variations due to mechanical tolerances.
.................................................
The results seem to be in line with many non module pancakes that CF has tested (FF/APSc) to date and looking at the tiny modules, expecting sharp corners especially at the price is a big ask.
We see his test results but CF takes plenty of images to see what the results are in real world situations as he is quite a fan of pancakes.
................................
Klaus wrote;
I wonder whether C.Frost refocuses in the corners. If not, the test results won't often reflect real life.
Field curvature hits hard in chart-based tests because the DoF is comparatively shallow.
I posted this question in the comments section of the video ..... maybe he will come back with a reply .........