Oh well, this image:
https://www.43rumors.com/wp-content/uplo....37.33.png
might be the explanation why OM-System went with a lower resolution EVF. The finder on the OM-1 ii is just too large to fit the OM-3.
I am really wondering what OM-System's strategy is. They said to IR almost two years ago that there might not be an E-M10 iv replacement in the pipeline. Not sure whether they have revised that strategy since or not. If not, I am wondering whether they want to go in a Leica direction of premium products only. There is no entry level Leica, and I don't think there will be one any time soon. The price updates to the 25/1.8 and 17/1.8 due to the Mk ii refresh also points to "moving out of entry level".
A number of reviews clearly pointed that the OM-3 is about style and usability. I for one can not stand the size of a typical 24-70/2.8. I am currently really enjoying my Olympus 45/1.8. If you now come back this is equivalent to a 90/3.5 in full frame, that is correct. But where is that small Nikon 90/3.5 to fit the Zf?
I also doubt, significant folk will buy into mFT because of the OM-3, but I am sure it will prevent people from leaving the system.
https://www.43rumors.com/wp-content/uplo....37.33.png
might be the explanation why OM-System went with a lower resolution EVF. The finder on the OM-1 ii is just too large to fit the OM-3.
I am really wondering what OM-System's strategy is. They said to IR almost two years ago that there might not be an E-M10 iv replacement in the pipeline. Not sure whether they have revised that strategy since or not. If not, I am wondering whether they want to go in a Leica direction of premium products only. There is no entry level Leica, and I don't think there will be one any time soon. The price updates to the 25/1.8 and 17/1.8 due to the Mk ii refresh also points to "moving out of entry level".
A number of reviews clearly pointed that the OM-3 is about style and usability. I for one can not stand the size of a typical 24-70/2.8. I am currently really enjoying my Olympus 45/1.8. If you now come back this is equivalent to a 90/3.5 in full frame, that is correct. But where is that small Nikon 90/3.5 to fit the Zf?
I also doubt, significant folk will buy into mFT because of the OM-3, but I am sure it will prevent people from leaving the system.
enjoy