02-16-2011, 08:25 AM
[quote name='genotypewriter' timestamp='1297807629' post='6139']
How was it ok for Nikon guys to bring up the 14-24 in every conversation until Canon showed up with the TS-E 17, TS-E 24 and the 24L II? Or the 70-200 VR II until the 70-200 IS II came out? Or for 35 years claim that no one needs a 24 1.4 until the 24 1.4G came out? That's just in the "FX" era, mind you... <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
...
[/quote]
Sorry GTW, but what you've stated here is a clear example for the definition of the expression "Canon guy"... (rather than "Canon user"). How come is this something like a football match for you... You're still out of context... Please find these "Nikon guys" wherever they are and show them what they deserve...
Serkan
How was it ok for Nikon guys to bring up the 14-24 in every conversation until Canon showed up with the TS-E 17, TS-E 24 and the 24L II? Or the 70-200 VR II until the 70-200 IS II came out? Or for 35 years claim that no one needs a 24 1.4 until the 24 1.4G came out? That's just in the "FX" era, mind you... <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
...
[/quote]
Sorry GTW, but what you've stated here is a clear example for the definition of the expression "Canon guy"... (rather than "Canon user"). How come is this something like a football match for you... You're still out of context... Please find these "Nikon guys" wherever they are and show them what they deserve...
Serkan