• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Forums > Back > Comparing lenses with Different Rating Scales
#1
Hi there,



I'm trying to make a comparison between the Sigma 10-20mm F3.5 for the Nikon APS-C and the Tokina 11-16mm for the Canon APS-C.



I know its not a good idea to make comparisons between two different camera sensors generally, but no review for the Tokina 11-16mm APS-C exists on the Nikon side -- and I'm making do with what information is available. (Personally, I'm a Nikon APS-C shooter.)



One difference I noticed is that the Rating Scales are completely different in the two reviews.



The tokina 11-16mm (which is tested on a 8MP Canon) says that "very good" starts at 1550 and "excellent" starts at 1850.

The sigma 10-20mm F3.5 (which is tested on a Nikon 10MP) says that "very good" starts at 1650 and "excellent" starts at 1950.



So how can I make an educated guess as to how they would compare if they were BOTH shot on the 10MP Nikon? Can I draw any reasonable conclusions?



Furthermore, what assumptions should I make about these lenses if I were to move up to a 16MP sensor like the D7000s? Should I expect that these lenses will all uniformly perform worse / better / the same? Or is it a crapshoot?
  Reply


Messages In This Thread
Comparing lenses with Different Rating Scales - by Guest - 02-23-2011, 08:22 AM
Comparing lenses with Different Rating Scales - by Guest - 02-23-2011, 03:52 PM
Comparing lenses with Different Rating Scales - by PuxaVida - 02-24-2011, 09:17 AM
Comparing lenses with Different Rating Scales - by genotypewriter - 02-25-2011, 03:08 AM
Comparing lenses with Different Rating Scales - by PuxaVida - 02-25-2011, 09:54 AM
Comparing lenses with Different Rating Scales - by genotypewriter - 02-23-2011, 11:13 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)