02-23-2011, 07:20 PM
[quote name='Pinhole' timestamp='1298462090' post='6296']
This must be something that Sigma have factored into their business model. I find it shocking how many important websites publish negative reviews of Sigma lenses, but at the same time they are still selling plenty of products.
I guess it's like McDonalds. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
[/quote]
Or rather for people who like to gamble. I personally managed to get a decent copy of 17-70mm, then absolutely cr*ppy 100-300mm, then surprisingly brilliant 30mm f/1.4, and now I'm not really sure whether it's a pattern and I should buy another sigma or not <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/unsure.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':unsure:' />
This must be something that Sigma have factored into their business model. I find it shocking how many important websites publish negative reviews of Sigma lenses, but at the same time they are still selling plenty of products.
I guess it's like McDonalds. <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
[/quote]
Or rather for people who like to gamble. I personally managed to get a decent copy of 17-70mm, then absolutely cr*ppy 100-300mm, then surprisingly brilliant 30mm f/1.4, and now I'm not really sure whether it's a pattern and I should buy another sigma or not <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/unsure.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt=':unsure:' />