02-24-2011, 02:11 PM
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1298555674' post='6320']
Nikon lenses CAN be decentered too, with your luck you might just hit a very decentered one <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />.
I would just get the lens that gives you what you want, and let any decentering defects be "repaired" or replaced.
The Sigma 85mm f1.4 for instance is such a lot cheaper, it is worth the try. And a 150mm f2.8 macro from Sigma is a great lens without any Nikon equivalent...
There are many SIgma lenses that behave ok too. My old 18-50mm f2.8 does not have any noticable decentering problems for instance.
[/quote]
The S85 seems to have other .... advantages ... too.
Nikon lenses CAN be decentered too, with your luck you might just hit a very decentered one <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />.
I would just get the lens that gives you what you want, and let any decentering defects be "repaired" or replaced.
The Sigma 85mm f1.4 for instance is such a lot cheaper, it is worth the try. And a 150mm f2.8 macro from Sigma is a great lens without any Nikon equivalent...
There are many SIgma lenses that behave ok too. My old 18-50mm f2.8 does not have any noticable decentering problems for instance.
[/quote]
The S85 seems to have other .... advantages ... too.