• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Forums > Back > Next PZ lens test report: Nikkor AF 35mm f/2.0 D (FX)
#9
I have a question on 35/2 vs 17-35/2.8.

From the results I conclude that in some aspects 35/2 apparently might be somewhat worse than the venerable zoom? It is one step faster and much cheaper, but if f/2.8 suffices, 17-35 is very practical range.

Are 17-35 FX tests in the pipeline, - and how do these two compare?
  Reply


Messages In This Thread
Next PZ lens test report: Nikkor AF 35mm f/2.0 D (FX) - by genotypewriter - 02-11-2011, 12:10 AM
Next PZ lens test report: Nikkor AF 35mm f/2.0 D (FX) - by genotypewriter - 02-14-2011, 12:18 AM
Next PZ lens test report: Nikkor AF 35mm f/2.0 D (FX) - by genotypewriter - 02-15-2011, 10:18 PM
Next PZ lens test report: Nikkor AF 35mm f/2.0 D (FX) - by Guest - 02-25-2011, 02:01 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)