03-03-2011, 08:27 PM
[quote name='mst' timestamp='1299183159' post='6482']
Yeah, sure ... <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/rolleyes.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
-- Markus
[/quote]
Yes, sure. If you happen to disagree on certain lenses, concerning bokeh, then just share your opinion and with some evidence of what you base it on.
Lenses of which I have said in the past the the Canon has smoother bokeh:
Canon 85mm f1.2 L IS USM II, compared to Nikon 85mm f1.4 D + G.
Canon 200mm f2 L IS USM, compared to Nikon 200mm f2 VR (I + II).
Canon 35mm f2, compared to Nikon 35mm AF-S f1.8 DX.
Especially from you I would expect more than just eye-rolling joining the flaming club..
I will gladly post samples again, to show what I base my opinion on. But then I expect a grown up debate about it, not the same name calling and flaming. A good debate is always welcome.
Yeah, sure ... <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/rolleyes.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' /> -- Markus
[/quote]
Yes, sure. If you happen to disagree on certain lenses, concerning bokeh, then just share your opinion and with some evidence of what you base it on.
Lenses of which I have said in the past the the Canon has smoother bokeh:
Canon 85mm f1.2 L IS USM II, compared to Nikon 85mm f1.4 D + G.
Canon 200mm f2 L IS USM, compared to Nikon 200mm f2 VR (I + II).
Canon 35mm f2, compared to Nikon 35mm AF-S f1.8 DX.
Especially from you I would expect more than just eye-rolling joining the flaming club..
I will gladly post samples again, to show what I base my opinion on. But then I expect a grown up debate about it, not the same name calling and flaming. A good debate is always welcome.