03-15-2011, 12:40 PM
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1300189019' post='6800']
They do not show that, though.... We see images with even seconds apart... the 3rd boy in the 2nd image did not materialize. And the 3rd image also is clearly not a next frame of a 10fps sequence.
What they DO show is that you can make photos with the camera from a field sports game. But that is normal, is it not? People were doing that with EOS 350D's 5 years ago too.
[/quote]
The person who took the photos (in 10 fps mode) claims that vast majority of them were in focus and AF tracking worked just fine in 10 fps. Better than most cameras in this price range. Just because he hasn't posted all similar/identical series to flickr doesn't mean AF tracking wasn't working in 10 fps mode.
The AF tracking works just fine in 10 fps, as IR, most reviews, and user report.
They do not show that, though.... We see images with even seconds apart... the 3rd boy in the 2nd image did not materialize. And the 3rd image also is clearly not a next frame of a 10fps sequence.
What they DO show is that you can make photos with the camera from a field sports game. But that is normal, is it not? People were doing that with EOS 350D's 5 years ago too.
[/quote]
The person who took the photos (in 10 fps mode) claims that vast majority of them were in focus and AF tracking worked just fine in 10 fps. Better than most cameras in this price range. Just because he hasn't posted all similar/identical series to flickr doesn't mean AF tracking wasn't working in 10 fps mode.
The AF tracking works just fine in 10 fps, as IR, most reviews, and user report.