03-16-2011, 09:51 PM
[quote name='mst' timestamp='1300256369' post='6854']
Among the affected cameras are current Panasonic cameras. Hilarious, yeah ...
[/quote]
I see you're not seeing the point again... the suggestion to use DNG was to minimise differences... not to eliminate them. Can't see how converting things to DNG is going to account for all the differences in sensors and internal data processing.
And even if Panasonic's affected, what's the worst outcome? You'll have to do it slightly differently for FourThirds and microFourThirds only. At the moment, aren't you guys using Apple Aperture for Canon and Adobe Camera Raw for Nikon or something like that? Is there some benefit in maximising the differences that I'm not quite seeing here?
GTW
Among the affected cameras are current Panasonic cameras. Hilarious, yeah ...
[/quote]
I see you're not seeing the point again... the suggestion to use DNG was to minimise differences... not to eliminate them. Can't see how converting things to DNG is going to account for all the differences in sensors and internal data processing.
And even if Panasonic's affected, what's the worst outcome? You'll have to do it slightly differently for FourThirds and microFourThirds only. At the moment, aren't you guys using Apple Aperture for Canon and Adobe Camera Raw for Nikon or something like that? Is there some benefit in maximising the differences that I'm not quite seeing here?
GTW