03-30-2011, 10:07 PM
[quote name='Klaus' timestamp='1301515759' post='7237']
Why do we need to indicate better resolution data than lenstip ? We are not in a contest to deliver the most pleasing result - this is about formal testing and not wishful thinking. .....
[/quote]
My impresion is that the resolution data has very different characteristics ...
At F0.95 the results are quite comparable and actually pretty good for F0.95 .... but stopped down there is a big difference between the reviews of photozone and optyczne/lenstip. I was just wondering why ... is it a matter of the cameras used, Pana GF-1 vs. Oly E-PL1 or the software used, Photoshop ACR vs. DCRaw ?
Of course it's not a race for the highest figures ... and it's about taking photos anyway, not just figures ...
I use the lens for available light photography and my impression is that the Nokton is really something special in the mFT-world or even in general.
Usable F0.95 for 849 Euros is remarkable.
Why do we need to indicate better resolution data than lenstip ? We are not in a contest to deliver the most pleasing result - this is about formal testing and not wishful thinking. .....
[/quote]
My impresion is that the resolution data has very different characteristics ...
At F0.95 the results are quite comparable and actually pretty good for F0.95 .... but stopped down there is a big difference between the reviews of photozone and optyczne/lenstip. I was just wondering why ... is it a matter of the cameras used, Pana GF-1 vs. Oly E-PL1 or the software used, Photoshop ACR vs. DCRaw ?
Of course it's not a race for the highest figures ... and it's about taking photos anyway, not just figures ...
I use the lens for available light photography and my impression is that the Nokton is really something special in the mFT-world or even in general.
Usable F0.95 for 849 Euros is remarkable.