04-08-2011, 07:23 PM
Yes, the 17-50mm f2.8 from Sigma is worth it over the Tamrons' for sure. Better optics, much better build, batter AF.
The 17-70 is an ok lens too, but you do not really need the extra focal range because you are getting that 70-300mm Tamron anyway.
If budget is too tight, I'd rather go for the EOS 600D and spend a bit extra on the lenses.
The 17-70 is an ok lens too, but you do not really need the extra focal range because you are getting that 70-300mm Tamron anyway.
If budget is too tight, I'd rather go for the EOS 600D and spend a bit extra on the lenses.