04-14-2011, 08:28 AM
Why would you think the new lens would be cheaper than then the AF-S NIKKOR 50mm f/1.4G?
Only because of f1.8 vs. f1.4?
I am looking at the 50mm prime for low light shots on DX of people where I can keep a little more distance than with the 35/1.8.
I was so close to get the AF-S 50/1.4, but now I am puzzled whether I should wait...
The new entry level lenses from Nikon seem to be all good, at least the 85/3.5 and the 55-300VR are.
Only because of f1.8 vs. f1.4?
I am looking at the 50mm prime for low light shots on DX of people where I can keep a little more distance than with the 35/1.8.
I was so close to get the AF-S 50/1.4, but now I am puzzled whether I should wait...
The new entry level lenses from Nikon seem to be all good, at least the 85/3.5 and the 55-300VR are.