04-16-2011, 08:07 PM
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1301753133' post='7325']
There is no infinity focus with this lens, it is designed with fixed focus. You have to move the camera to focus. It is designed to be an 1:4 lens, when you reverse mount it a 4:1 lens. The GH2 is very expensive and I don't like it cheap plastic fake DLSR look, I was hoping for a GFx with GH2 sensor in future.
Problem with the micro 4/3rds cameras still is that there is no adapter that puts the lens at the "right" distance to the sensor, even the LSM mount to micro 4/3rds put it further away. So.. using it as designed, it will need a custom made M39 to micro 4/3rds adapter which does not act as an extension tube. At this distance, though, not even on micro 4/3rds the entire frame will be covered by the image circle!
It needs some puzzling and figuring out what is the best setup/application for this crazy sharp gem...
[/quote]
Today I bought this lens. But after some tests I find that the quality of quite normal 60mm AF-S is better.
There is no infinity focus with this lens, it is designed with fixed focus. You have to move the camera to focus. It is designed to be an 1:4 lens, when you reverse mount it a 4:1 lens. The GH2 is very expensive and I don't like it cheap plastic fake DLSR look, I was hoping for a GFx with GH2 sensor in future.
Problem with the micro 4/3rds cameras still is that there is no adapter that puts the lens at the "right" distance to the sensor, even the LSM mount to micro 4/3rds put it further away. So.. using it as designed, it will need a custom made M39 to micro 4/3rds adapter which does not act as an extension tube. At this distance, though, not even on micro 4/3rds the entire frame will be covered by the image circle!
It needs some puzzling and figuring out what is the best setup/application for this crazy sharp gem...
[/quote]
Today I bought this lens. But after some tests I find that the quality of quite normal 60mm AF-S is better.