04-18-2011, 04:34 PM
[quote name='mst' timestamp='1303143718' post='7738']
Well, of course we could do something like this, but at least for me the question is: should we?
The star rating is only a part of the two or three page reviews, and I don't want to see them reduced just to that rating.
-- Markus
[/quote]
Besides that the the star ratings are not totally consistent from review to review..
It sounds a bit weird to me... I do not think it is very usual for people to look for "3.5 star lenses". One is looking for for instance a standard zoom for APS-C, or a macro lens with a longer focal length, or a normal prime, or a 300mm tele. And that brings one to a certain lens, and then one wants to know how it performs in certain aspects.
Well, of course we could do something like this, but at least for me the question is: should we?
The star rating is only a part of the two or three page reviews, and I don't want to see them reduced just to that rating.
-- Markus
[/quote]
Besides that the the star ratings are not totally consistent from review to review..
It sounds a bit weird to me... I do not think it is very usual for people to look for "3.5 star lenses". One is looking for for instance a standard zoom for APS-C, or a macro lens with a longer focal length, or a normal prime, or a 300mm tele. And that brings one to a certain lens, and then one wants to know how it performs in certain aspects.