04-19-2011, 01:53 PM
[quote name='thurft' timestamp='1303219800' post='7766']
My main problem with the D300 is that most of my imgs were blury or with not alot of detail while other friends with canon and same price equipment had better quality pictures under same situations.
[/quote]
A properly working D300, with proper technique and decent lens this will not produce blury images. This equipment is used by many professionals, who rely on them to earn a living. So unless there was a problem with the body (focusing to long or to short), this reads to me, that you need to work on your technique or you will be in for the same disappointment with either of Canons. This kind of equipment is not meant to be "point-and-shoot".
My suggestion is to go for the cheaper, as others point out for many tasks, the differences between them are minuscule. If you still have money to spare, buying a better lens might be a better idea than buying a more expensive body.
My main problem with the D300 is that most of my imgs were blury or with not alot of detail while other friends with canon and same price equipment had better quality pictures under same situations.
[/quote]
A properly working D300, with proper technique and decent lens this will not produce blury images. This equipment is used by many professionals, who rely on them to earn a living. So unless there was a problem with the body (focusing to long or to short), this reads to me, that you need to work on your technique or you will be in for the same disappointment with either of Canons. This kind of equipment is not meant to be "point-and-shoot".
My suggestion is to go for the cheaper, as others point out for many tasks, the differences between them are minuscule. If you still have money to spare, buying a better lens might be a better idea than buying a more expensive body.
enjoy