05-02-2011, 02:38 PM
Klaus, if you regard the stabilized viewfinder as an advantage then why would you choose a non-stabilized lens? After all, the in-body IS can be turned off (this is what Sigma recommends).
|
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Tamron 18-270 for Sony - is lack of IS a disadvantage? - by boren - 05-02-2011, 01:28 PM
Tamron 18-270 for Sony - is lack of IS a disadvantage? - by Klaus - 05-02-2011, 02:01 PM
Tamron 18-270 for Sony - is lack of IS a disadvantage? - by boren - 05-02-2011, 02:38 PM
Tamron 18-270 for Sony - is lack of IS a disadvantage? - by Brightcolours - 05-02-2011, 04:49 PM
Tamron 18-270 for Sony - is lack of IS a disadvantage? - by boren - 05-02-2011, 06:02 PM
Tamron 18-270 for Sony - is lack of IS a disadvantage? - by popo - 05-02-2011, 06:10 PM
Tamron 18-270 for Sony - is lack of IS a disadvantage? - by Klaus - 05-02-2011, 06:21 PM
|
Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)