05-03-2011, 11:53 AM
[quote name='miro' timestamp='1304420922' post='8020']
No It isn't. The RAW file file processed with the SAME VERSION of 3-th party RAW converter gives similar results.
[/quote]
No it isn't what, miro?
I can't make sense of your post.
I said: "The 7D is very usable at higher ISO's too, so that should not be a concern."
Which is true, it is a very capable camera, also at higher ISO's (OP mentions ISO 800 and 1600 being used regularly).
So what are you talking about regarding "similar results" and "3-th <sic> party RAW converters"?
Puzzling.
No It isn't. The RAW file file processed with the SAME VERSION of 3-th party RAW converter gives similar results.
[/quote]
No it isn't what, miro?
I can't make sense of your post.
I said: "The 7D is very usable at higher ISO's too, so that should not be a concern."
Which is true, it is a very capable camera, also at higher ISO's (OP mentions ISO 800 and 1600 being used regularly).
So what are you talking about regarding "similar results" and "3-th <sic> party RAW converters"?
Puzzling.