05-08-2011, 09:33 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-08-2011, 09:36 PM by Brightcolours.)
[quote name='oneguy' timestamp='1304889329' post='8143']
Perhaps your biased "opinion" (as we debated this last time) is BS. You have admitted to never even touched A55, but you were complaining about A33 review on this site (photozone) for sports rating.
Note A550 was already pretty similarto A700 for AF speed. A55/A580 are both faster as can be seen in this video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YmSkWTpdE6M
[/quote]
It may well be that the A55 is faster than an A700 in AF speed, that os not what you were referring to, you referred to the bullshit IR "test" which in too many ways is juts nonsense. And that was not about AF speed, but about AF tracking. Two very different things.
I showed that even my Canon EOS 450D, with slower (f4 vs f2.8) lens, did a better job tracking similar subjects at the by that so called "test from IR" described circumstances (which then let to the conclusion that even the described circumstances were incorrect).
So, not only did that IR test show very bad results for that A55v in their crops (1 out of 9 images actually in focus), they did not show any 7D results, they did not say which lens was used on the 7D, they did not say the A55v did equally well (they merely said "we feel" that it was comparable", but they also were not even able to correctly state the test parameters.
And my EOS 450D did a significantly better job of tracking with an f4 lens. In lower light conditions.
And my complains about teh posts rating of the A33 are valid and I explained why it should not get that high a rating too.
Perhaps your biased "opinion" (as we debated this last time) is BS. You have admitted to never even touched A55, but you were complaining about A33 review on this site (photozone) for sports rating.
Note A550 was already pretty similarto A700 for AF speed. A55/A580 are both faster as can be seen in this video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YmSkWTpdE6M
[/quote]
It may well be that the A55 is faster than an A700 in AF speed, that os not what you were referring to, you referred to the bullshit IR "test" which in too many ways is juts nonsense. And that was not about AF speed, but about AF tracking. Two very different things.
I showed that even my Canon EOS 450D, with slower (f4 vs f2.8) lens, did a better job tracking similar subjects at the by that so called "test from IR" described circumstances (which then let to the conclusion that even the described circumstances were incorrect).
So, not only did that IR test show very bad results for that A55v in their crops (1 out of 9 images actually in focus), they did not show any 7D results, they did not say which lens was used on the 7D, they did not say the A55v did equally well (they merely said "we feel" that it was comparable", but they also were not even able to correctly state the test parameters.
And my EOS 450D did a significantly better job of tracking with an f4 lens. In lower light conditions.
And my complains about teh posts rating of the A33 are valid and I explained why it should not get that high a rating too.