05-11-2011, 05:10 AM
[quote name='you2' timestamp='1305029204' post='8199']
Wow. Puts the 50f1.4 to shame. The sony has the 85f1.4 and 135f2. The 85f1.4 performs quite well at f2 though it is not a macro. I think I rather have that 85f1.4 than this 100f2 <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
[/quote]
I have the Sony 85/1.4. But it's not macro or even 1:4.
The Sony 135/1.8 is 1:4 but too heavy for travel.
Wow. Puts the 50f1.4 to shame. The sony has the 85f1.4 and 135f2. The 85f1.4 performs quite well at f2 though it is not a macro. I think I rather have that 85f1.4 than this 100f2 <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />
[/quote]
I have the Sony 85/1.4. But it's not macro or even 1:4.
The Sony 135/1.8 is 1:4 but too heavy for travel.
http://flickr.com/ephankim