• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Forums > Back > phase- vs contrast-detection AF
#3
[quote name='popo' timestamp='1305200891' post='8253']

Definitely interesting, but perhaps over-simplified. Did they do a similar comparison chart for AF accuracy of a moving target? <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='Tongue' />

[/quote]



This is the original page:

http://www.panasonic.net/avc/lumix/systemcamera/gms/g3/af.html



As far as tracking is concerned I wouldn't really call this hard data.

However, the Sony SLTs are "good" here already so there's no reason why the Gs should be any worse.
  Reply


Messages In This Thread
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by Klaus - 05-12-2011, 11:11 AM
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by popo - 05-12-2011, 11:48 AM
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by Klaus - 05-12-2011, 12:16 PM
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by Guest - 05-12-2011, 02:02 PM
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by Klaus - 05-12-2011, 02:37 PM
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by popo - 05-12-2011, 04:38 PM
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by Klaus - 05-12-2011, 05:00 PM
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by Sylvain - 05-12-2011, 09:30 PM
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by popo - 05-12-2011, 10:21 PM
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by Guest - 05-13-2011, 06:09 AM
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by PuxaVida - 05-13-2011, 06:58 AM
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by Klaus - 05-13-2011, 09:24 AM
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by popo - 05-13-2011, 11:28 AM
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by PuxaVida - 05-13-2011, 01:00 PM
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by Klaus - 05-13-2011, 01:52 PM
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by Guest - 05-13-2011, 06:08 PM
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by PuxaVida - 05-14-2011, 09:37 AM
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by Guest - 05-14-2011, 09:49 AM
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by PuxaVida - 05-15-2011, 11:38 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)