• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Forums > Back > phase- vs contrast-detection AF
#10
To clarify, yes, I was trying to say if DSLR contrast AF could be speeded up if they sample faster in a similar way to how Panasonic describe. I'm assuming the DSLR sampling rate will be at most that provided by the video modes, or up to 60fps typically.
<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.
  Reply


Messages In This Thread
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by Klaus - 05-12-2011, 11:11 AM
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by popo - 05-12-2011, 11:48 AM
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by Klaus - 05-12-2011, 12:16 PM
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by Guest - 05-12-2011, 02:02 PM
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by Klaus - 05-12-2011, 02:37 PM
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by popo - 05-12-2011, 04:38 PM
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by Klaus - 05-12-2011, 05:00 PM
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by Sylvain - 05-12-2011, 09:30 PM
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by popo - 05-12-2011, 10:21 PM
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by Guest - 05-13-2011, 06:09 AM
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by PuxaVida - 05-13-2011, 06:58 AM
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by Klaus - 05-13-2011, 09:24 AM
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by popo - 05-13-2011, 11:28 AM
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by PuxaVida - 05-13-2011, 01:00 PM
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by Klaus - 05-13-2011, 01:52 PM
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by Guest - 05-13-2011, 06:08 PM
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by PuxaVida - 05-14-2011, 09:37 AM
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by Guest - 05-14-2011, 09:49 AM
phase- vs contrast-detection AF - by PuxaVida - 05-15-2011, 11:38 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)