05-13-2011, 06:58 AM
[quote name='popo' timestamp='1305200891' post='8253']
Definitely interesting, but perhaps over-simplified. Did they do a similar comparison chart for AF accuracy of a moving target? <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />
[/quote]
Agreed... Way too over-simplified... Measuring AF accuracy in a decent quantitative way and puting results on a graph (like these unbelievably nice looking curves) seems to be unrealistic to me. CD part might be OK because it's their system, and they have a specific way to measure it. But what about the counter part? Which PD AF, what kind of a scene is it, are there moving subjects etc...
Serkan
Definitely interesting, but perhaps over-simplified. Did they do a similar comparison chart for AF accuracy of a moving target? <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />[/quote]
Agreed... Way too over-simplified... Measuring AF accuracy in a decent quantitative way and puting results on a graph (like these unbelievably nice looking curves) seems to be unrealistic to me. CD part might be OK because it's their system, and they have a specific way to measure it. But what about the counter part? Which PD AF, what kind of a scene is it, are there moving subjects etc...
Serkan