[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1308851928' post='9456']
That is the problem with the Ricoh, it changes its sensor per lens. So... not really comparable still..
[/quote]
The ability to use different sensors sizes with a single camera is not a problem, it's an advantage. The only problem with the GXR concept is that the more expensive modules (A12) aren't further separated into mount+sensor and lens. The M-mount module is a change in the right direction. The small sensor modules (which I find very appealing) don't really need such separation. It would only make these modules more expensive without real justification.
The GXR/P10 is still the only camera that's comparable to the Pentax Q, even if you ignore the whole lens/lensor interchangeability. Comparable is not the same as identical.
That is the problem with the Ricoh, it changes its sensor per lens. So... not really comparable still..
[/quote]
The ability to use different sensors sizes with a single camera is not a problem, it's an advantage. The only problem with the GXR concept is that the more expensive modules (A12) aren't further separated into mount+sensor and lens. The M-mount module is a change in the right direction. The small sensor modules (which I find very appealing) don't really need such separation. It would only make these modules more expensive without real justification.
The GXR/P10 is still the only camera that's comparable to the Pentax Q, even if you ignore the whole lens/lensor interchangeability. Comparable is not the same as identical.