06-25-2011, 04:18 AM
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1308958227' post='9489']
20-30 frames is a really long exposure time... Better not have any moving subjects in the image <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />...It is a gimmick product, with very interesting math behind it.
[/quote]
Agreed, and will further point out that I read somewhere that the lightfield camera does not work well with stop-action photos of moving subjects for some reason. Implying that taking 6 frames in a tenth of a second in some kind of high speed movie mode, say at 1920x1080 resolution, not impossible, might with a bunch of post processing, get you a serviceable version of what the lightfield camera is doing with fairly static subjects.
20-30 frames is a really long exposure time... Better not have any moving subjects in the image <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />...It is a gimmick product, with very interesting math behind it.[/quote]
Agreed, and will further point out that I read somewhere that the lightfield camera does not work well with stop-action photos of moving subjects for some reason. Implying that taking 6 frames in a tenth of a second in some kind of high speed movie mode, say at 1920x1080 resolution, not impossible, might with a bunch of post processing, get you a serviceable version of what the lightfield camera is doing with fairly static subjects.