[quote name='ThomasD' timestamp='1309026856' post='9524']
Not that it would be of any help with your decision, but Olympus has the Standard, Pro, and Top Pro lines of lenses. Only the Pro and Top Pro lenses are sealed, which is why your 70-300 were not. The 90-250/2.8 and the 50-200/2.8-3.5 should both be sealed.
[/quote]
Fair enough, I knew although overpriced the 70-300 wasn't a high end lens. If the 50-200 takes a 1.4x that would do, although I don't fancy getting an Oly body to match it... so none of those really are more cost effective than getting the 70-300L.
Not that it would be of any help with your decision, but Olympus has the Standard, Pro, and Top Pro lines of lenses. Only the Pro and Top Pro lenses are sealed, which is why your 70-300 were not. The 90-250/2.8 and the 50-200/2.8-3.5 should both be sealed.
[/quote]
Fair enough, I knew although overpriced the 70-300 wasn't a high end lens. If the 50-200 takes a 1.4x that would do, although I don't fancy getting an Oly body to match it... so none of those really are more cost effective than getting the 70-300L.
<a class="bbc_url" href="http://snowporing.deviantart.com/">dA</a> Canon 7D2, 7D, 5D2, 600D, 450D, 300D IR modified, 1D, EF-S 10-18, 15-85, EF 35/2, 85/1.8, 135/2, 70-300L, 100-400L, MP-E65, Zeiss 2/50, Sigma 150 macro, 120-300/2.8, Samyang 8mm fisheye, Olympus E-P1, Panasonic 20/1.7, Sony HX9V, Fuji X100.