06-27-2011, 07:28 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-27-2011, 08:13 PM by Brightcolours.)
[quote name='guy_incognito' timestamp='1309198226' post='9588']
You don't seem to understand. Follow the link I posted. Look at the histogram of the first photo.
[/quote]
I have.. now what does that high dynamic scene got to do with the much lower dynamic scenes in the Pentax lens review post?
The first photo you refer to is with sun.. and even into the sun... The Pentax lens review post only contains cloudy or very low sunset images.
Which, like I said before, do not pose a big challenge for my 450D.
The image on that site you refer to, is a high dynamic range scene, and it shows an image after whatever conversion that is of low dynamic range (compared to the scene). We see clipping both at the right side and the left side of the histogram.
If the image was a high dynamic range image, like the scene, we would not see those high peaks (they would be more smeared out) and we would not see them cut off (they would go down before the boundaries of the histogram).
You don't seem to understand. Follow the link I posted. Look at the histogram of the first photo.
[/quote]
I have.. now what does that high dynamic scene got to do with the much lower dynamic scenes in the Pentax lens review post?
The first photo you refer to is with sun.. and even into the sun... The Pentax lens review post only contains cloudy or very low sunset images.
Which, like I said before, do not pose a big challenge for my 450D.
The image on that site you refer to, is a high dynamic range scene, and it shows an image after whatever conversion that is of low dynamic range (compared to the scene). We see clipping both at the right side and the left side of the histogram.
If the image was a high dynamic range image, like the scene, we would not see those high peaks (they would be more smeared out) and we would not see them cut off (they would go down before the boundaries of the histogram).