06-27-2011, 08:41 PM
[quote name='Brightcolours' timestamp='1309202899' post='9590']
If the image was a high dynamic range image, like the scene, we would not see those high peaks (they would be more smeared out) and we would not see them cut off (they would go down before the boundaries of the histogram).
[/quote]
That's the point. That's the benefit of a camera with a high dynamic range. Do you understand now?
(EDIT: You can download the first sunset/sunrise 645D picture in that thread. There is a small bump on the far right of the histogram, corresponding to the sun. There is a larger bump on the far left corresponding to the foreground.)
I was only referring to your post about dynamic range and contrast. I wasn't interested in a debate on MF vs. your 450D camera.
If the image was a high dynamic range image, like the scene, we would not see those high peaks (they would be more smeared out) and we would not see them cut off (they would go down before the boundaries of the histogram).
[/quote]
That's the point. That's the benefit of a camera with a high dynamic range. Do you understand now?
(EDIT: You can download the first sunset/sunrise 645D picture in that thread. There is a small bump on the far right of the histogram, corresponding to the sun. There is a larger bump on the far left corresponding to the foreground.)
I was only referring to your post about dynamic range and contrast. I wasn't interested in a debate on MF vs. your 450D camera.