07-01-2011, 10:04 AM
[quote name='PuxaVida' timestamp='1309514265' post='9683']
Please don't let them die before the VF and ISO performance at low light gets better in MFT systems <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />...
[/quote]
What is exactly objectively "better" when using an optical VF in low light ? It provides an even darker VF image ... wow ... now what exactly do you do with that ?
An EVF shows an amplified images. Yes, it's noisy. Yes, it has a slow refresh rate. Yet ... you can actually evaluate your scene. Personally I rather prefer to see "something" than very little.
Please don't let them die before the VF and ISO performance at low light gets better in MFT systems <img src='http://forum.photozone.de/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' />...
[/quote]
What is exactly objectively "better" when using an optical VF in low light ? It provides an even darker VF image ... wow ... now what exactly do you do with that ?
An EVF shows an amplified images. Yes, it's noisy. Yes, it has a slow refresh rate. Yet ... you can actually evaluate your scene. Personally I rather prefer to see "something" than very little.