[Rainer]

Thanks for the report ...



albeit u4/3 will likely not become my favourite system.



However, reading the report, there is something I'm wondering about:

If distortion is corrected in-camera or by most raw-converters ... why

do they do an "incomplete" correction ... leaving some amount of

barrel (or pincushion) distortion in the image. I know that distortion

at a given focal length is also depending on focusdistance ... nevertheless,

I think they could do better than they actually do. What is the gain in not

correcting any better?



Just a thought ... Rainer