07-09-2011, 03:16 PM
Do you have any larger images (not 100% but say 50% or so?). Do you find the fact that the camera picks the compression on the jpeg and there are no controls for such?
-
Still debating between this and the sx230. On most of the reviews they rate the hx9v higher but at the same time they show images form the canon with obviously better detail (though I tend towards the sony colours which are a bit warmer).
[quote name='popo' timestamp='1310125027' post='9812']
Some early test samples I did with the HX9V you can also download at full size are at the following:
http://fav.me/d3jc0op
http://fav.me/d3jbzvl
http://fav.me/d3jbyxb
http://fav.me/d3jbyej
As mentioned before, you probably wont ever be satisfied with pixel peeping the output, but do look at it at typical output sizes and there I have no complaint.
The photos were taken in the various auto modes, which do a pretty good job. There are more image output settings available in P/M modes but I haven't really played with them. No RAW output.
[/quote]
-
Still debating between this and the sx230. On most of the reviews they rate the hx9v higher but at the same time they show images form the canon with obviously better detail (though I tend towards the sony colours which are a bit warmer).
[quote name='popo' timestamp='1310125027' post='9812']
Some early test samples I did with the HX9V you can also download at full size are at the following:
http://fav.me/d3jc0op
http://fav.me/d3jbzvl
http://fav.me/d3jbyxb
http://fav.me/d3jbyej
As mentioned before, you probably wont ever be satisfied with pixel peeping the output, but do look at it at typical output sizes and there I have no complaint.
The photos were taken in the various auto modes, which do a pretty good job. There are more image output settings available in P/M modes but I haven't really played with them. No RAW output.
[/quote]